Skip to content
Search

Ontario Grain Farmer Magazine is the flagship publication of Grain Farmers of Ontario and a source of information for our province’s grain farmers. 

Optimum Corn N Rate

AGRONOMIC INFORMATION FROM ONTARIO'S CROP SPECIALISTSAGRONOMIC INFORMATION FROM ONTARIO'S CROP SPECIALISTS

Ben Rosser, Corn Industry Program Lead, Ontario Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs

THERE ARE MANY tools available to guide nitrogen (N) rate decisions, but nothing beats good on-farm N response data. These three methods might assist in determining how close your corn N rates are to the optimum.

FIGURE 1. YIELDS, RESPONSE CURVE AND OPTIMUM N RATE FROM AN ONTARIO MULTI-RATE N TRIAL.

MULTI-RATE N TRIAL

The gold standard is the multi-rate N trial. Several N rates are applied from zero to a non-limiting rate (e.g., 200-250 lb-N/ac), and an N response curve is generated (Figure 1). Optimum N rates typically occur a little before yields plateau.

Pros
• Most accurate method

Cons
• Requires several N rates (lots of plots)
• May include N rates with yield losses
• Statistical software required to fit yield response curves

DELTA-YIELD ESTIMATION

A shortcut to the multi-rate N trial is the delta-yield estimation method using the “N-Rate Evaluator” tool at www.gocorn.net (Figure 2). This method only requires two rates: a zero-N rate and a non-limiting N rate (Figure 3).

The yield difference (“delta-yield”) between these treatments allows us to estimate the optimum N rate based on relationships established in historical Ontario N datasets.

Pros
• Requires only two N rates
• Provides a reasonable estimate of the optimum N rate

Cons
• Requires a zero N rate (yield loss)

FIGURE 3. ZERO-N (LEFT) AND NON-LIMITING N (RIGHT) STRIPS AT AN ONTARIO CORN N TRIAL.

THE “+/- 30-LB” TEST

The simplest method is likely the “+/- 30-lb” test. This test involves testing N rates slightly higher and lower than the normal field N rate to see if yields respond. It will not deliver an optimum N rate like the first two methods but can indicate whether normal field N rates might be high, low, or about right.

Pros
• Require only two additional N rates
• Does not require low N rates (minimal yield loss)

Cons
• Does not provide an optimum N rate

Optimum N rates vary year-to-year and spatially across fields. One test in one year indicates what worked in that spot for that year, but replication of N tests over time and space is critical for confident decision-making. •

Next:

In this issue: